More About This Website

LowDownCentral is your one-stop source for incisive political and conservative social commentary -- infused with a twinge of humor.

Contributing Writers

LDCLTimage.jpg

LANCE THOMPSON

lancet@q.com

ROSE PEDENKO

ldcpedenko@hotmail.com

 

LDCTSimage.jpg

TANYA SIMON

lowdowncentral_ts@yahoo.com

PAULINE BOREN

conservativecook@gmail.com

    

 

 

 

 

Login
LowDown Commercialism
Google
THE NEWS YOU NEED TO KNOW

Students Kicked Off Campus for Wearing American Flag Tees

But to many Mexican-American students at Live Oak, this was a big deal. They say they were offended by the five boys and others for wearing American colors on a Mexican holiday.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36981179?GT1=43001

TWITTER

TODAY ON LDC

 

 

 

Entries in Harry Reid (5)

Tuesday
Aug172010

Oval Office Reversals

 

by Lance Thompson

President Obama must be frustrated. No matter what position he takes on the
13-story mega-mosque to be built next to the hallowed ground of the 9/11
terrorist attack (and he's taken as many positions as possible), none of
them seems to satisfy everyone.

Obama first came out four-square behind the mosque and the rights of the
radical imam who wishes to build a monument to radical islam at the site of
its greatest desecration. Later, Obama clarified that he was only defending
the constitutional right to freedom of religion, not the wisdom of building
the mosque. Then White House Deputy Press Secretary Bill Burton, in a
Saturday evening statement, said that this backpedaling should not be seen
as backpedaling. Now even Harry Reid, a man desperately in need of
political allies, has broken with the president's position (whatever it
currently is) to say that no mosque should be built at Ground Zero.

It prompts one to wonder what might have happened if all our presidents
possessed Obama's unwavering commitment to a principle.

Ronald Reagan hastened the end of Soviet domination of Europe with his
challenge, "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall." Obama's version might have
added, "And we'll use American taxpayer money to help you build a better
wall."

John F. Kennedy challenged a generation with, "We shall pay any price, bear
any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe in order
to assure the survival and success of liberty." Obama's version might have
added, "unless that means irritating state sponsors of terrorism or radical
islamists, in which case we will roll over and abandon our long time
allies."

Franklin Roosevelt, to help Great Britain during the harrowing, early days
of World War II, established the Lend-Lease program to supply aid to the
Brits in their struggle against Nazi Germany. FDR said America must become
"the great arsenal of democracy." Obama might have added, "unless the Nazis
win another battle, in which case we'll plan a summit with Hitler and
discuss plans for redecorating Buckingham Palace."

Abraham Lincoln identified the purpose of the Civil War as ensuring that
"this government of the people, by the people and for the people shall not
perish from this earth." Obama's version would have added, "But we'd settle
for a socialist utopia that will plunge us into unsustainable debt and
worldwide ridicule."

These amendments to famous presidential pronouncements are unthinkable to
Americans who treasure their heritage and take pride in what this country
stands for. President Obama will never understand such feelings, for he
does not share them. He will never understand such people, for he is not
one of them. And he will not be re-elected by such people, because,
increasingly, they understand him all too well. 

Thursday
Mar252010

Remember

 

by Lance Thompson 

 
A Democrat Congress with overwhelming majorities and a Democrat president with a hard left agenda have enacted into law a massive takeover of a vast sector of our economy.  They did this over the objections of what every poll showed to be a majority of Americans.  Health care reform was also enacted over bipartisan objection–no Republicans voted for the bill, but several Democrats voted against it.  Health care reform was achieved at the cost of crippling debt and the certainty of seismic disruption of our health care system.  Liberals consider this a victory.  Conservatives should see it as a declaration of war.
 
The other side has named the stakes.  They want a dependent population that will have to rely upon and petition the government for health care, and enslave the same population with massive debt.  If they prevail, government will be the highest authority in every aspect of your private life–not simply medical care.  Government will tell us what we can eat, how much we can weigh, what activities we can participate in, and how old is too old to receive medical treatment.  All of these are part of the new health bill.  All this comes at a multi-trillion dollar price.  Even the CBO (Cooked Book Office) estimate says the cost will be at least one trillion dollars, but they can’t predict most of the fiscal effects.  The end of personal liberty for every American and fiscal ruin for the nation’s economy are the stakes.
 
The other side has established the tactics.  “By Any Means Necessary” is the name of the play book which inspired the statements “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste,” from Rahm Emmanuel; “We have to pass the bill to see what’s in it,” from Nancy Pelosi; “We make up the rules as we go along,” from Alcee Hastings; and “I won, you lost,” from Barack Obama himself.  These attitudes were embodied in secret partisan meetings to draft voluminous and unintelligible legislation, blatant bribes to curry favor and win Congressional votes, bookkeeping and accounting tricks to hide the unsustainable costs, and lie upon lie about the nature and consequences of socialist health policy.
 
We could certainly respond to these tactics by adopting them, but the unscrupulous actions of the Democrats in the White House and Congress contribute greatly to the dissatisfaction most Americans have expressed.  We must use Constitutional means to wage this war, not unconstitutional.  But we must use every legal weapon, tactic and strategy in the arsenal our Founding Fathers provided. 
 
Republicans and responsible Democrats in Congress must use every legislative rule and loophole to delay, disrupt and repeal this attack on American liberty.  Our Constitution was created to keep any one political entity from quickly and easily passing such sweeping legislation.  Those on the left have trampled the checks and balances, the deliberative processes, and the careful framework of governance that have served this country so well throughout its history.  We must not stoop that low, but we must meet this assault with every legitimate countermeasure afforded us.
 
We must not be silent when those in the media choose to cheerlead for one party, overlook ethical lapses, or ignore outright graft and corruption.  We must contradict every false statement, challenge every illicit maneuver, and indict every guilty party regardless of the rules of decorum.  Too much is at stake to let a single falsehood stand or any charlatan to act with impunity.  We must raise our voices, stand our ground, and demand justice and accountability from our elected representatives.
 
This is not a war we sought, but there is too much at stake to falter in the face of this enemy.  Americans have often found themselves bruised and bloodied at the beginning of such conflicts.  In the opening months of the Revolution, General Washington retreated across nearly the entire breadth of Colonial America.  In the Civil War, the Union was rocked by a succession of costly defeats.  In World War II, Japanese forces advanced halfway across the Pacific before being checked.  We have always recovered from initial defeats, rallied against the enemy, and prevailed in the long struggle to protect our freedoms.  We must do the same in this fight.  The enemy wins only if we roll over and accept the loss of our liberty. 
 
In earlier conflicts, we have coined phrases that reminded us of the cause, and stiffened our resolve.  “Remember the Alamo,” “Remember the Maine,” “Remember Pearl Harbor,” “Remember 9/11.”  We, too, must remember the continual assaults on our Constitution, our freedom, and our individual rights.  We must remember during every day of this struggle, and particularly on November 2nd, all those who took part in and made possible this outrage, and demonstrate to them that it is the people who have the final say–at the ballot box. 
 
When she became Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi was fond of pointing out that “elections have consequences.”  We must remind her and her fellow Democrats that Congressional votes have consequences as well, and that we won’t forget.  Those responsible will be held accountable. Perhaps we can add another phrase to the list of stirring American rallying cries in the cause of freedom: “Remember in November.”

Tuesday
Mar032009

Supporting the President

by  Lance Thompson

A recent controversy the media have embraced, rather than examining the wisdom of spending more money than America has ever had, was sparked by commentator Rush Limbaugh when he dared to say that he hoped that President Obama failed to remake the economy and the government.  Liberals gasped at this, likening it to high treason.

Some Republicans on the Sunday shows have been quick to disavow Limbaugh’s statement as well.  House Republican Whip Eric Cantor said “no one wants this president to fail.”  Congressman Mike Pence echoed the sentiment.  Congressional Republicans participated in Obama’s Fiscal Summit on 23 February, engaging in “break-out sessions” and reporting their “findings.”  They acted as if the responsible Republican “no” votes on the stimulus package were in need of an apology, and that nothing would be worse than being labeled “partisan.”

For all those Republicans whose convictions lead them to go along to get along, I have a solution.  And it is certain to be respected by the Left, because the Left came up with it.

While the outcome of the war in Iraq was still in doubt, the Democrats did everything they could to bring about defeat for the United States.  Democrats in Congress called the war criminal, immoral, and unwinnable.  Democrats introduced various resolutions to end the war, pull out the troops, and cut off funding.  Of course, Democrats were smart enough to know that these actions, while solidifying their support among liberals, was not going over well with the families of our troops.  Thus, they came up with a bumper sticker to plaster over their shameful actions:  “We support the troops, but not the war.”  This, they thought, allowed them to have it both ways.

This solution can easily be adopted by Republicans who can’t bring themselves openly to defy the president.  All they have to say is, “I support the president, but not his policies.”  Painless, isn’t it?  Let’s all try it, shall we?

I support the president, but not his Politburo of a cabinet.  I don’t support the collection of tax cheats, terrorist sympathizers, baby killers (if Governor Sebelius is confirmed as HHS Secretary) that the president has appointed to his administration to carry out his socialist agenda.

I support the president, but not his spendaholic stimulus bills, bailout bills, redistribution of income and tax hikes on anyone who actually works for a living.  I don’t support his plunging the nation into a bottomless pit of debt and sticking responsible Americans with the tab.

I support the president, but not his Secretary of State’s nuzzling of Red China, subsidies for Hamas to rebuild Gaza into a terrorist base, and abandoning former Soviet Republics to the increasingly belligerent Russia.

I support the president, but not his outsourcing of executive policy to Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, so they can rush legislation through Congress without letting most members of the legislative branch even read it. 

I support the president, but not his plan to nationalize health care and give a bureaucrat authority over my own medical needs.

Wasn’t that easy?  Republicans who still want to be invited to interviews on the MSM, chic Washington parties, and The View, can embrace this two-faced construction.  They can gush over Obama’s diction, his wife’s taste in clothing, his lavish entertaining.  But they can still oppose the policies that are remaking the nation in the socialist image.

Speaking for myself, I don’t support the president or his policies, and I doubt that any future conservative leaders do either.  Those who like to play both sides will not earn, nor do they deserve, the support of conservative voters.  Our future leaders will be those who are not afraid to state their principles and live by them.

Of course, if the president decides to reverse course, cut taxes, beef up the military, get rid of the criminals in his own administration, reduce spending, and stop giving the money of working people to non-working people, I’ll gladly support him and his policies.  But I’m not holding my breath.

 

Monday
Feb092009

Stimulating Times

by Lance Thompson

 

As the stimulus bill staggers through committee, its egregious profligacy more obvious with each passing hour, President Obama remains its steadfast defender. If Obama had made no other decisions during his first three weeks as president, this suicidal spending package would be enough to reveal his incompetence. But he did not stop there.

 

After his Air Force One joy ride to the Democrat conference in Williamsburg, Obama whined to sympathetic pols that he’d inherited a massive debt by the previous administration, “wrapped in a big bow and waiting for me.” Yet Obama’s response to this burden is to quadruple that debt and leave that much more insidious legacy to the next few presidents. Obama came to office saddled with a heavy credit card balance. His answer is not only to ask Congress for a drastically higher credit limit but also allow them to spend every dime of it immediately.

 

The President has focused a great deal of energy and political capital on a bill that he had little or no hand in shaping. In fact, this bill, consisting of 647 plus pages before amendments, could not possibly have been written in the short time Obama has been in office. This stimulus bill, purportedly the last best hope of our nation for fiscal health, is not the work of economists grappling with a financial crisis. That would have taken weeks or months. No, this massive piece of legislation could only have been compiled so quickly by the cut and paste magic of word processing. Every liberal chestnut on the Democrat wish list was double-clicked into this “emergency” stimulus bill, under the supervision of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. This was their chance to get it all in one go, with the nation evidently willing to try anything, and the newly-elected president content to cheerlead from the White House.

 

But the stimulus bill is not Obama’s only foray into executive action. He also has made many presidential appointments to cabinet and other positions. Judging from the unsavory nature of many of his picks–Daschle, Geithner, Richardson, Killefer, Holder, Lynn--this seems to be Obama’s jobs program for at-risk Democrats. He lures them away from lives of tax evasion and influence peddling with character-building jobs in the new administration. Some, like Ricahrdson, Daschle and Killefer, withdrew in the face of mounting outrage over their above-the-law behavior, went back to their day jobs, which suggests a high recidivism rate for this particular effort.

 

Not content to cripple the American economy, Obama has also been active in foreign policy. In an al-Arabiyah interview, he apologized for America’s tendency to “dictate” to the people of the Middle East. He doesn’t seem to understand that freedom, of the kind our military provided for the people of Iraq, is a precious gift. It is the oppression Iraqis and Kuwaitis suffered under Saddam Hussein that had to be dictated and brutally enforced. Obama’s statements were a slur on every American serving in uniform and especially upon those who fought for the freedom of Muslims in the Balkans, in the first Gulf War, in Iraq and Afghanistan.

 

Obama’s backpedaling on placing American missile defense systems in Eastern Europe has already emboldened Russian president Mevedev and puppetmaster Putin to threaten the fragile freedom of the former Soviet republics still living in the shadow of the Russian bear. Under Russian pressure, the independent state of Kyrgyzstan closed its Manas air base to US supply flights to Afghanistan. The Kremlin has also announced it will aid the Iranian terrorist-sponsoring regime of Mahmoud Achmadinejad to bolster its nuclear program, which Achmadinejad has vowed to pursue at all costs.

 

The president recently vowed to unilaterally keep space free of American weaponry. He must believe that the accelerated space programs of Russia, Red China, North Korea and now Iran are all being undertaken for humanitarian purposes. Our nation has many implacable enemies. They have already taken the measure of our president and found in his equivocal manner an opportunity to advance their antagonistic designs.

 

On the home front, neither Barack Obama nor his exceedingly inarticulate spokesman, Robert Gibbs, likes to answer substantive questions. Obama treats any press inquiry about a matter of policy as a breach of manners, and is likely to scold the reporter. I am more forgiving of Gibbs. If I had to explain the mind-numbing incompetency of Obama policy, I would perspire, stammer and obfuscate as well.

 

Obama’s first three weeks in office have antagonized and united domestic opponents, confused and frustrated Democrat allies, and left foreign leaders–both friendly and otherwise–unimpressed. What we needed at this moment of crisis was a leader with courage, experience and resolve. What we got was a paper-hatted trainee who each day gives us a new reason to hope for change.

 

 

 

Monday
Oct202008

The Accusation Game

by Lance Thompson

It has long been a Democrat tactic to accuse Republicans of whatever unprincipled, illicit or deplorable act that they themselves are about to perpetrate. This tactic has been repeatedly employed with great success, and is about to pay off with the grand prize of the Presidency.

The Democrats paint themselves as champions of free speech. The broadcast news networks, MSNBC, CNN and the major newspapers and news magazines all support the Democrats. Only FoxNews and talk radio are free of liberal bias, yet even these outlets are unacceptable to Democrats. Thus, Democrats plan to resurrect the Fairness Doctrine, a regulation that requires media outlets to present balanced views. This regulation will not be applied to the already liberal-leaning news outlets, but to talk radio, whose conservative voices the Democrats cannot bear. Democrats ask for votes to protect free speech even as they plan to muffle conservative voices.

The Democrats pose as friends of the working man, touting the Employee Free Choice Act as evidence. But the Free Choice Act is precisely the opposite, removing the requirement of a secret ballot from union elections. Under the Free Choice Act, union representatives can confront employees, not only at work, but in public or at home, and coerce them to sign cards in support of joining a union. The Democrats, who have the overwhelming support of unions and their pension funds, are no friends of employees, but are the bought servants of union bosses.

For years, Democrats have fought to ease or remove identification requirements for voting. Accusing Republicans of trying to disenfranchise minorities, Democrats have passed legislation that allows people to vote without identification, without a permanent address, without pre-registration. With each new statute, the validity of elections is eroded.

The Democrats have steered taxpayer funds to the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN). ACORN is the group that Barack Obama strongly supported, steered funding to, and worked with as an attorney during his community organizing days in Chicago. ACORN’s co-founder, Wade Rathke, was a member of the Students of a Democratic Society, the organization from which the terrorist group Weather Underground sprung. ACORN is currently under investigation in fourteen states for fraudulently registering voters who are already registered under other names, already registered in other states, deceased, or don’t exist at all. The long-term campaign to ease registration requirements make possible the wholesale manufacture of bogus votes. The votes ACORN manufactures are Democrat votes. Thus, as Democrats ask for your vote to fight disenfranchisement of minorities, they are in fact using your votes and money to disenfranchise you.

Both Barack Obama and Joe Biden, along with the usual Democrats in Congress, have blamed the current financial crisis on rampant deregulation during the Bush years. Vote Democrat, they say, and they will restore the regulations that will repair the economy. In fact, it was over-regulation that caused the housing crisis in the first place. The Community Reinvestment Act, passed under Carter and enlarged under Clinton, coerced lenders to make loans to people who could not pay them back. Incidentally, they were helped with this coercion by the people at ACORN. Over-regulation forced banks to make risky loans, yet the Democrat solution is still more regulation.

These Orwellian tactics–seeking to take away our rights under the guise of protecting them–have been part of a long-standing and effective campaign to seize power. Seizing power is also something the Democrats accuse the Republicans of, because that is what the Democrats are about to do. They will defraud the American electorate, secure the White House and Congress, and fill the judicial branch with liberal judges. The direction of the country will be decided for at least a generation.

Ordinarily at this point, I would say that’s why this election is so important. Unfortunately, our side is limited to only one vote per person.