More About This Website

LowDownCentral is your one-stop source for incisive political and conservative social commentary -- infused with a twinge of humor.

Contributing Writers

LDCLTimage.jpg

LANCE THOMPSON

lancet@q.com

ROSE PEDENKO

ldcpedenko@hotmail.com

LDCTSimage.jpg

TANYA SIMON

lowdowncentral_ts@yahoo.com

Login
LowDown Commercialism
Google
TWITTER

TODAY ON LDC

 

 

 

Entries in Harry Reid (3)

Tuesday
03Mar2009

Supporting the President

by  Lance Thompson

A recent controversy the media have embraced, rather than examining the wisdom of spending more money than America has ever had, was sparked by commentator Rush Limbaugh when he dared to say that he hoped that President Obama failed to remake the economy and the government.  Liberals gasped at this, likening it to high treason.

Some Republicans on the Sunday shows have been quick to disavow Limbaugh’s statement as well.  House Republican Whip Eric Cantor said “no one wants this president to fail.”  Congressman Mike Pence echoed the sentiment.  Congressional Republicans participated in Obama’s Fiscal Summit on 23 February, engaging in “break-out sessions” and reporting their “findings.”  They acted as if the responsible Republican “no” votes on the stimulus package were in need of an apology, and that nothing would be worse than being labeled “partisan.”

For all those Republicans whose convictions lead them to go along to get along, I have a solution.  And it is certain to be respected by the Left, because the Left came up with it.

While the outcome of the war in Iraq was still in doubt, the Democrats did everything they could to bring about defeat for the United States.  Democrats in Congress called the war criminal, immoral, and unwinnable.  Democrats introduced various resolutions to end the war, pull out the troops, and cut off funding.  Of course, Democrats were smart enough to know that these actions, while solidifying their support among liberals, was not going over well with the families of our troops.  Thus, they came up with a bumper sticker to plaster over their shameful actions:  “We support the troops, but not the war.”  This, they thought, allowed them to have it both ways.

This solution can easily be adopted by Republicans who can’t bring themselves openly to defy the president.  All they have to say is, “I support the president, but not his policies.”  Painless, isn’t it?  Let’s all try it, shall we?

I support the president, but not his Politburo of a cabinet.  I don’t support the collection of tax cheats, terrorist sympathizers, baby killers (if Governor Sebelius is confirmed as HHS Secretary) that the president has appointed to his administration to carry out his socialist agenda.

I support the president, but not his spendaholic stimulus bills, bailout bills, redistribution of income and tax hikes on anyone who actually works for a living.  I don’t support his plunging the nation into a bottomless pit of debt and sticking responsible Americans with the tab.

I support the president, but not his Secretary of State’s nuzzling of Red China, subsidies for Hamas to rebuild Gaza into a terrorist base, and abandoning former Soviet Republics to the increasingly belligerent Russia.

I support the president, but not his outsourcing of executive policy to Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, so they can rush legislation through Congress without letting most members of the legislative branch even read it. 

I support the president, but not his plan to nationalize health care and give a bureaucrat authority over my own medical needs.

Wasn’t that easy?  Republicans who still want to be invited to interviews on the MSM, chic Washington parties, and The View, can embrace this two-faced construction.  They can gush over Obama’s diction, his wife’s taste in clothing, his lavish entertaining.  But they can still oppose the policies that are remaking the nation in the socialist image.

Speaking for myself, I don’t support the president or his policies, and I doubt that any future conservative leaders do either.  Those who like to play both sides will not earn, nor do they deserve, the support of conservative voters.  Our future leaders will be those who are not afraid to state their principles and live by them.

Of course, if the president decides to reverse course, cut taxes, beef up the military, get rid of the criminals in his own administration, reduce spending, and stop giving the money of working people to non-working people, I’ll gladly support him and his policies.  But I’m not holding my breath.

 

Monday
09Feb2009

Stimulating Times

by Lance Thompson

 

As the stimulus bill staggers through committee, its egregious profligacy more obvious with each passing hour, President Obama remains its steadfast defender. If Obama had made no other decisions during his first three weeks as president, this suicidal spending package would be enough to reveal his incompetence. But he did not stop there.

 

After his Air Force One joy ride to the Democrat conference in Williamsburg, Obama whined to sympathetic pols that he’d inherited a massive debt by the previous administration, “wrapped in a big bow and waiting for me.” Yet Obama’s response to this burden is to quadruple that debt and leave that much more insidious legacy to the next few presidents. Obama came to office saddled with a heavy credit card balance. His answer is not only to ask Congress for a drastically higher credit limit but also allow them to spend every dime of it immediately.

 

The President has focused a great deal of energy and political capital on a bill that he had little or no hand in shaping. In fact, this bill, consisting of 647 plus pages before amendments, could not possibly have been written in the short time Obama has been in office. This stimulus bill, purportedly the last best hope of our nation for fiscal health, is not the work of economists grappling with a financial crisis. That would have taken weeks or months. No, this massive piece of legislation could only have been compiled so quickly by the cut and paste magic of word processing. Every liberal chestnut on the Democrat wish list was double-clicked into this “emergency” stimulus bill, under the supervision of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. This was their chance to get it all in one go, with the nation evidently willing to try anything, and the newly-elected president content to cheerlead from the White House.

 

But the stimulus bill is not Obama’s only foray into executive action. He also has made many presidential appointments to cabinet and other positions. Judging from the unsavory nature of many of his picks–Daschle, Geithner, Richardson, Killefer, Holder, Lynn--this seems to be Obama’s jobs program for at-risk Democrats. He lures them away from lives of tax evasion and influence peddling with character-building jobs in the new administration. Some, like Ricahrdson, Daschle and Killefer, withdrew in the face of mounting outrage over their above-the-law behavior, went back to their day jobs, which suggests a high recidivism rate for this particular effort.

 

Not content to cripple the American economy, Obama has also been active in foreign policy. In an al-Arabiyah interview, he apologized for America’s tendency to “dictate” to the people of the Middle East. He doesn’t seem to understand that freedom, of the kind our military provided for the people of Iraq, is a precious gift. It is the oppression Iraqis and Kuwaitis suffered under Saddam Hussein that had to be dictated and brutally enforced. Obama’s statements were a slur on every American serving in uniform and especially upon those who fought for the freedom of Muslims in the Balkans, in the first Gulf War, in Iraq and Afghanistan.

 

Obama’s backpedaling on placing American missile defense systems in Eastern Europe has already emboldened Russian president Mevedev and puppetmaster Putin to threaten the fragile freedom of the former Soviet republics still living in the shadow of the Russian bear. Under Russian pressure, the independent state of Kyrgyzstan closed its Manas air base to US supply flights to Afghanistan. The Kremlin has also announced it will aid the Iranian terrorist-sponsoring regime of Mahmoud Achmadinejad to bolster its nuclear program, which Achmadinejad has vowed to pursue at all costs.

 

The president recently vowed to unilaterally keep space free of American weaponry. He must believe that the accelerated space programs of Russia, Red China, North Korea and now Iran are all being undertaken for humanitarian purposes. Our nation has many implacable enemies. They have already taken the measure of our president and found in his equivocal manner an opportunity to advance their antagonistic designs.

 

On the home front, neither Barack Obama nor his exceedingly inarticulate spokesman, Robert Gibbs, likes to answer substantive questions. Obama treats any press inquiry about a matter of policy as a breach of manners, and is likely to scold the reporter. I am more forgiving of Gibbs. If I had to explain the mind-numbing incompetency of Obama policy, I would perspire, stammer and obfuscate as well.

 

Obama’s first three weeks in office have antagonized and united domestic opponents, confused and frustrated Democrat allies, and left foreign leaders–both friendly and otherwise–unimpressed. What we needed at this moment of crisis was a leader with courage, experience and resolve. What we got was a paper-hatted trainee who each day gives us a new reason to hope for change.

 

 

 

Monday
20Oct2008

The Accusation Game

by Lance Thompson

It has long been a Democrat tactic to accuse Republicans of whatever unprincipled, illicit or deplorable act that they themselves are about to perpetrate. This tactic has been repeatedly employed with great success, and is about to pay off with the grand prize of the Presidency.

The Democrats paint themselves as champions of free speech. The broadcast news networks, MSNBC, CNN and the major newspapers and news magazines all support the Democrats. Only FoxNews and talk radio are free of liberal bias, yet even these outlets are unacceptable to Democrats. Thus, Democrats plan to resurrect the Fairness Doctrine, a regulation that requires media outlets to present balanced views. This regulation will not be applied to the already liberal-leaning news outlets, but to talk radio, whose conservative voices the Democrats cannot bear. Democrats ask for votes to protect free speech even as they plan to muffle conservative voices.

The Democrats pose as friends of the working man, touting the Employee Free Choice Act as evidence. But the Free Choice Act is precisely the opposite, removing the requirement of a secret ballot from union elections. Under the Free Choice Act, union representatives can confront employees, not only at work, but in public or at home, and coerce them to sign cards in support of joining a union. The Democrats, who have the overwhelming support of unions and their pension funds, are no friends of employees, but are the bought servants of union bosses.

For years, Democrats have fought to ease or remove identification requirements for voting. Accusing Republicans of trying to disenfranchise minorities, Democrats have passed legislation that allows people to vote without identification, without a permanent address, without pre-registration. With each new statute, the validity of elections is eroded.

The Democrats have steered taxpayer funds to the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN). ACORN is the group that Barack Obama strongly supported, steered funding to, and worked with as an attorney during his community organizing days in Chicago. ACORN’s co-founder, Wade Rathke, was a member of the Students of a Democratic Society, the organization from which the terrorist group Weather Underground sprung. ACORN is currently under investigation in fourteen states for fraudulently registering voters who are already registered under other names, already registered in other states, deceased, or don’t exist at all. The long-term campaign to ease registration requirements make possible the wholesale manufacture of bogus votes. The votes ACORN manufactures are Democrat votes. Thus, as Democrats ask for your vote to fight disenfranchisement of minorities, they are in fact using your votes and money to disenfranchise you.

Both Barack Obama and Joe Biden, along with the usual Democrats in Congress, have blamed the current financial crisis on rampant deregulation during the Bush years. Vote Democrat, they say, and they will restore the regulations that will repair the economy. In fact, it was over-regulation that caused the housing crisis in the first place. The Community Reinvestment Act, passed under Carter and enlarged under Clinton, coerced lenders to make loans to people who could not pay them back. Incidentally, they were helped with this coercion by the people at ACORN. Over-regulation forced banks to make risky loans, yet the Democrat solution is still more regulation.

These Orwellian tactics–seeking to take away our rights under the guise of protecting them–have been part of a long-standing and effective campaign to seize power. Seizing power is also something the Democrats accuse the Republicans of, because that is what the Democrats are about to do. They will defraud the American electorate, secure the White House and Congress, and fill the judicial branch with liberal judges. The direction of the country will be decided for at least a generation.

Ordinarily at this point, I would say that’s why this election is so important. Unfortunately, our side is limited to only one vote per person.